Baymard Institute has published a set of ten research-backed UX best practices aimed at peak sales periods like Cyber Monday, drawn from large-scale usability testing and thousands of manually scored UX performance ratings. The findings are timely, but their relevance extends well beyond a single shopping event.

The research identifies five broad problem areas: helping shoppers find deals quickly, communicating prices and discounts clearly, surfacing shipping and returns information at the right moment, building confidence through social proof, and streamlining the checkout process itself. Each of these areas represents a category where friction compounds under pressure. During high-traffic sales periods, shoppers are comparing multiple sites simultaneously, their patience is shorter, and any moment of confusion accelerates abandonment.

One finding stands out in particular: roughly half of users rely on site search to locate products, yet Baymard’s benchmark shows that most large ecommerce sites fail to support even basic query types reliably. A shopper entering a combined attribute search and receiving zero results does not assume the product is out of stock; they assume the site does not carry it and leave. That is a conversion failure rooted entirely in UX, with no relation to pricing or stock availability.

For Dutch and Belgian merchants preparing for Q4 peak periods including Singles Day, Black Friday, and Cyber Monday, the practical implication is clear: these are not seasonal problems to patch before November. Search usability, discount presentation, and checkout flow are structural issues that affect conversion rates throughout the year. Addressing them before peak traffic arrives means the improvement compounds across every high-intent visit, not just the promotional window.

Merchants who treat Baymard’s research as a checklist for November will capture some gains. Those who treat it as a structural audit framework will see the benefit in every month of the calendar.

Source: baymard.com

Related reading

• Cart abandonment in Dutch webshops: what the data actually shows
• Half of shoppers still abandon after reaching checkout

The post 10 Cyber Monday UX lessons every merchant should apply year-round appeared first on betaaloptimaal.nl.

Er is een stille verschuiving gaande in hoe webshops bezocht worden. Naast de menselijke bezoeker die visueel scant en op gevoel beslist, kruipen steeds vaker AI-agents over je pagina’s. Die agents halen content op voor AI-modellen zoals ChatGPT, Gemini en Claude, zodat die modellen antwoorden kunnen formuleren op vragen van potentiële kopers. De manier waarop zo’n agent jouw pagina leest, verschilt fundamenteel van hoe een mens dat doet.

Waar een menselijke bezoeker reageert op visuele hiërarchie, kleur, gezichten en emotionele triggers, parseert een AI-agent razendsnel de onderliggende HTML-structuur en zoekt naar logica, semantiek en gestructureerde data. Een mooie hero-afbeelding of een slim geplaatste social-proof banner registreert een AI-agent nauwelijks. Wat hij wél oppikt: duidelijke koppen, gestructureerde productinformatie, schema-markup en heldere, beknopte tekst die semantisch klopt.

Voor retailers en brands in Nederland en België is dit relevant omdat de buyer journey steeds vaker begint bij een AI-model en niet bij een zoekmachine. Als jouw productpagina of checkoutflow slecht leesbaar is voor een AI-agent, loop je kans dat je merk of product simpelweg niet opduikt in AI-gegenereerde koopadvieizen. Dat raakt de bovenkant van de funnel, maar ook de conversion: een shopper die via een AI-tool zijn beslissing heeft genomen, converteert sneller als jouw site aansluit bij wat hij al heeft gezien.

De praktische les is dat de twee optimalisatiedoelen elkaar minder bijten dan ze lijken. Duidelijke koppen en beknopte alinea’s helpen ook menselijke scanners. Gestructureerde productdata helpt zowel Google als AI-agents. Een logische paginahiërarchie verbetert zowel de menselijke navigatie als de machine-leesbaarheid. Retailers die nu investeren in semantisch sterke pagina-opbouw en schema-markup bouwen tegelijk aan betere checkout funnel-instroom én aan zichtbaarheid in AI-gestuurde aankooptrajecten.

De opkomst van de AI-agent als websitebezoeker is geen toekomstmuziek. Het is een extra reden om lang uitgesteld technisch content-werk nu prioriteit te geven.

Bron: frankwatching.com

Verder lezen

• Stop asking for account creation before the confirmation page
• Kruidvat’s headless rebuild keeps conversion at the core

The post Websites optimaliseren voor mens én AI-agent tegelijk appeared first on betaaloptimaal.nl.

Baymard Institute’s latest mobile e-commerce benchmark delivers an uncomfortable verdict: not a single one of the 138 leading US and European sites studied achieves a “good” overall mobile UX score. The entire field clusters around “mediocre” to “decent”, with very few outright broken experiences but also virtually no standout performers. For merchants who assumed their mobile experience was competitive simply because it was functional, this data should prompt a rethink.

The findings matter particularly for Dutch and Belgian merchants because mobile now accounts for the majority of online traffic in both markets, and the gap between traffic share and conversion rate on mobile remains stubbornly wide at most webshops. A mediocre mobile experience does not just frustrate shoppers, it systematically suppresses conversion. Baymard identifies four specific areas dragging down scores across the industry: main navigation within mobile homepage and category pages, search autocomplete, mobile forms, and sitewide interface elements. These are not obscure edge cases. They sit directly in the path a shopper must travel before reaching the checkout.

Mobile forms deserve particular attention from a checkout perspective. Field design, keyboard triggering, input validation, and error messaging on small screens are notoriously difficult to get right, and Baymard’s research consistently shows they are a primary source of abandonment. If a merchant’s mobile form experience is “mediocre” by industry standards, and those standards are themselves mediocre, the actual room for improvement is substantial.

The practical implication is straightforward. Merchants should not benchmark their mobile UX against their direct competitors alone, because this research shows the competitive set is largely underperforming together. Instead, the benchmark ceiling, what a “good” implementation actually looks like at the component level, is the more useful target. Prioritising mobile form optimisation, autocomplete behaviour, and navigation clarity will generate measurable conversion gains precisely because so few competitors have addressed them properly.

Source: baymard.com

Related reading

• Buy buttons: how one-tap checkout cuts abandonment
• Frictionless checkout: why the holidays expose every weak spot in your flow

The post Mobile UX on most webshops is still mediocre, Baymard finds appeared first on betaaloptimaal.nl.

When one of the Benelux’s largest drugstore chains rebuilds its webshop from scratch, other merchants should pay close attention. Kruidvat has launched a fundamentally new site built on a headless architecture, decoupling the presentation layer from its backend to allow faster iteration on the customer-facing experience. The technical choice is notable, but the editorial story here is what the team chose to protect during that rebuild.

Conversion learnings from the old site were deliberately carried forward. Years of behavioural data, optimisation cycles, and validated UX patterns were not abandoned in the excitement of a fresh start. That discipline separates successful platform migrations from costly ones. Redesigns that discard proven drop-off reducers in favour of visual novelty routinely see conversion dip in the months after launch, a painful lesson that Kruidvat appears to have studied carefully.

The decision to align the new webshop with the Kruidvat app, which was redesigned two years ago and has since demonstrated its UX model, is equally instructive. The team mapped which design principles could carry across channels and where app and browser demand different solutions. The framing they settled on, consistent but channel-specific, is the right one. A shopper toggling between the app and a desktop browser should not feel they are dealing with two separate retailers. That sense of continuity directly affects trust and willingness to complete a purchase.

For Dutch and Belgian merchants evaluating platform migrations, the message is practical. Headless architecture buys flexibility and development speed, but those gains only translate into commercial results if the UX layer on top is anchored in real customer behaviour rather than design trends. The rebuild is an enabler, not the outcome. The outcome is a checkout journey that converts at least as well as the one it replaced, and ideally better.

Mid-to-large merchants running ageing monolithic platforms will recognise the pattern Kruidvat faced: a system that worked well in its time but gradually became a brake on iteration. The answer is not to wait until the platform fails, but to migrate with conversion continuity as a hard requirement from day one.

Source: kruidvat.nl

Related reading

• Stop asking for account creation before the confirmation page
• Turn the checkout moment into a loyalty engine

The post Kruidvat’s headless rebuild keeps conversion at the core appeared first on betaaloptimaal.nl.

Most checkout dashboards are built around loss. Abandonment rate, failed transactions, drop-off by step. These are valid signals, but they only capture the sessions that visibly broke. The far larger performance gap sits in sessions that completed without incident yet left the customer subtly less likely to return. Measuring only failure means optimising only for survival, not for growth.

For Dutch and Belgian merchants, this distinction is increasingly consequential. The payment mix has become genuinely complex. iDEAL still dominates in the Netherlands, but wallet adoption is climbing and BNPL methods like Klarna and in3 are now meaningful conversion levers for younger segments. A checkout built for a simpler landscape two or three years ago is not neutral. It is a silent drag, accumulating friction cost across thousands of sessions every month without ever producing a single trackable failure event.

The compounding opportunity in stored credentials deserves particular attention. A returning customer who lands at checkout with payment method and address already pre-filled completes in seconds. That speed compounds: lower resistance per visit increases return frequency, which increases basket completion over time. Merchants who layer structured A/B testing on top of stored credentials build genuine behavioural knowledge. Those who rely on intuition optimise against assumptions they have never actually tested.

The confirmation page is the most consistently wasted surface in the checkout flow. Post-purchase trust peaks at exactly that moment, and a static receipt screen discards it entirely. Treating the confirmation page as an active re-engagement surface, rather than a receipt stub, means every earlier optimisation has to work less hard to produce the same return visit.

The practical implication is a shift in audit framing. Map where forward momentum stalls across the complete journey, not just where sessions terminate. Allocate optimisation budget to friction points that reduce return likelihood, not only to those that kill the current session. The merchants who close that measurement gap first will find it contains more performance upside than anything their current abandonment reports can show them.

Source: pymnts.com

Related reading

• Fix the card management leak losing your returning customers
• When frictionless checkout becomes a fraudster’s fastest route

The post Measure your checkout as a growth loop, not a failure report appeared first on betaaloptimaal.nl.

SCAYLE’s large-scale shopper research lands a number that every merchant should pin above their dashboard: eight out of ten shoppers who had a negative brand experience did not come back. That reframes checkout optimisation entirely. Abandonment is not a leaky bucket you patch over time. For most affected shoppers, it is the final verdict on your brand.

The implication is structural. A marketing team driving traffic into a poorly optimised checkout is not growing the business. It is accelerating churn at the most expensive moment in the customer journey. The checkout is where every earlier friction point compounds: a slow page, an ambiguous product description, a cluttered cart. By the payment step, the shopper’s patience is already depleted.

For merchants in the Netherlands and Belgium, the payment method finding is especially direct. iDEAL and Bancontact are not nice-to-haves. They are the baseline expectation. A Dutch or Belgian shopper who reaches the payment screen and does not see their preferred method does not think “what a shame.” They think “this merchant does not know me” and switch to a competitor in seconds. Switching costs are zero. The alternative is one tab away.

Price transparency deserves equal attention. Shipping costs or surcharges that appear only at the final step do not just cause last-minute abandonment. They actively damage trust, even when the total is competitive. The fix is upstream: surface the full cost on the product page or in the mini-cart. Shoppers who see the complete picture early either commit with confidence or exit before investing further time. Both outcomes beat a final-screen walkaway.

The practical starting point is a checkout audit focused on three questions: where does cost information first become visible, does the payment method mix match your actual customer base, and which steps in the flow exist for operational convenience rather than shopper benefit? That audit will almost certainly deliver a better return than the next acquisition campaign.

Source: scayle.com

Related reading

• Stop asking for account creation before the confirmation page
• Cashierless supermarkets: how far along is frictionless POS checkout?

The post One bad checkout moment is enough to lose a customer forever appeared first on betaaloptimaal.nl.

A survey by payabl. puts a hard number on what too many merchants still treat as a minor inconvenience: 43% of shoppers across the UK, Germany, and the Netherlands say they will not return to a retailer after a poor checkout experience. That transforms every abandoned basket from a missed transaction into a permanent customer loss.

For Dutch merchants specifically, the figure is 36%. More than one in three Dutch shoppers cites a cumbersome checkout as the reason for leaving. That places the Netherlands between the UK at 44% and Germany at 29%. The gap matters because it shows Dutch consumers are already meaningfully responsive to checkout quality, and that sensitivity will only intensify as cross-border competition tightens on price, delivery, and now checkout experience.

The stored credentials data adds a design constraint that Dutch merchants cannot ignore. Only 16% of Dutch shoppers are willing to save payment details with retailers broadly. That is a low baseline. It means one-click repeat purchase flows are not a reliable conversion lever in this market. The design priority has to shift toward guest checkout: fewer mandatory fields, cleaner inline error handling, and payment methods that carry inherent trust. iDEAL earns its place here not just for market penetration but because it removes the hesitation that comes with entering card details on an unfamiliar storefront.

One data point in the survey demands careful interpretation. A quarter of UK shoppers said they would remove fraud checks entirely for a faster checkout. That is not a design brief. The correct response is invisible security: SCA implemented behind a well-designed UX so the compliance layer never surfaces as a visible speed bump. Friction reduction and verification reduction are fundamentally different things. Conflating them creates chargeback exposure and regulatory risk that costs far more than a lost conversion.

The practical starting point is straightforward. Run your own checkout flow from basket to confirmation, count every form field, and test your error messages on a real mobile device. Those variables are within your control, and they determine which side of that 36% figure your store sits on.

Source: thepaypers.com

Related reading

• How offering the right payment method lifts conversion and loyalty
• Turn the checkout moment into a loyalty engine

The post Checkout abandonment costs Dutch merchants more than one sale appeared first on betaaloptimaal.nl.

More than half of consumers will walk away from a purchase simply because their preferred payment method is not available. That single statistic, drawn from Adyen’s retail research, should be uncomfortable reading for any merchant still treating payment method coverage as a low-priority infrastructure decision.

The gap is real and measurable. While digital wallets are now a primary payment instrument for more than a quarter of consumers, only 28% of retailers accept them across all their channels. BNPL adoption among shoppers continues to grow, yet only 17% of merchants offer it consistently online and in-store. QR code payments are growing at 11% annually. These are not niche preferences. They are mainstream behaviours that checkout flows are failing to accommodate.

For Dutch and Belgian merchants, the stakes are particularly high. Both markets have strong domestic payment habits alongside rapid growth in mobile and wallet-based payments. Dutch consumers are used to frictionless iDEAL flows and are increasingly combining that expectation with Apple Pay and Google Pay at checkout. Belgian shoppers show similar dual-track behaviour. A checkout that cannot flex to meet those preferences does not just lose one transaction. It damages repurchase intent.

The omnichannel dimension adds further complexity. Consumers do not distinguish between a brand’s app, its website, and its physical store. They expect payment continuity across all three. Unified commerce platforms are being positioned as the answer, but the real test is whether the checkout layer genuinely surfaces the right payment options in the right context, rather than simply sharing a back-end ledger.

The practical implication for merchants is clear: payment method coverage is now a conversion lever, not just an operational checkbox. Auditing which methods are live where, and identifying the gaps relative to your actual customer base, is a concrete starting point. Social commerce channels deserve the same audit. Three quarters of retailers surveyed reported revenue growth after enabling social shopping, yet payment completion rates on those channels often lag behind core checkout flows.

Source: adyen.com

Related reading

• How SSENSE cut checkout time by 70% and what it means for you
• What shoppers actually want at checkout to stay loyal

The post Why 55% of shoppers abandon when their payment method is missing appeared first on betaaloptimaal.nl.

A benchmark study covering actual shopping transactions across five European countries, including the Netherlands, has produced a number that every online merchant should pin to their wall: 51% of shoppers identify checkout as the primary area retailers need to fix. Not product discovery, not pricing, not delivery. Checkout.

The data from Manhattan Associates and Incisiv goes further. Some 35% of shoppers abandon their cart because the checkout process feels too long, and 30% leave when faced with multiple steps and lengthy forms. These are not edge cases. They are structural conversion leaks that compound across every campaign, every traffic spike, and every seasonal peak.

For Dutch and Belgian merchants, this research lands with particular weight. The Netherlands is one of the five countries included in the benchmark, meaning the findings reflect actual purchase behaviour in this market. With iDEAL transitions, the rise of one-click payment methods, and strong consumer expectations shaped by players like bol.com, Dutch shoppers have little patience for bloated checkout flows. Every redundant field, every unnecessary step, and every page reload is a measurable risk.

The personalisation gap flagged in the study is equally telling. Some 58% of respondents said retailers only personalise marketing messages, not the actual customer experience. In checkout terms, this means showing a generic form to a returning customer who has already stored their address and payment credentials. Leveraging stored credentials, surfacing the preferred payment method first, and pre-filling known data are straightforward wins that most merchants are still leaving on the table.

The implication is direct: audit your checkout flow against these three failure points. Count your steps, measure your form fields, and test whether returning customers experience a meaningfully faster path than first-time buyers. The benchmark has just told you where the money is being lost.

Source: retailx.net

Related reading

• Checkout abandonment costs Dutch merchants more than one sale
• One bad checkout moment is enough to lose a customer forever

The post Half of shoppers say checkout is where retailers fail them most appeared first on betaaloptimaal.nl.

Conversion uplift figures tend to get thrown around loosely in e-commerce, but research tied to real transaction data carries more weight. A study run in partnership between Shopify and BCG puts hard numbers on what many merchants have long suspected: the checkout experience is one of the highest-leverage points in the entire customer journey, yet it remains systematically under-optimised by most retailers.

The headline finding is striking. Offering accelerated payment methods such as Shop Pay, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal can drive conversion uplifts of up to 50 percent compared to standard checkout flows. Simplified checkout flows add up to 18.9 percent on top of that. These are not marginal gains. For a Dutch or Belgian merchant running meaningful monthly volumes, even a fraction of those uplifts translates directly into significant incremental revenue without any additional spend on acquisition.

The research also surfaces something worth internalising: device type alone accounts for up to 7.7 percent variance in conversion. Given that mobile commerce now dominates traffic in the Benelux market, merchants who have not specifically optimised their checkout for smaller screens are handing conversions to competitors who have.

The underlying argument is structural. As paid media costs continue to rise across Meta and Google, the economics of customer acquisition deteriorate. Every visitor who reaches checkout but fails to complete represents wasted spend that cannot be recovered. Optimising checkout is, in effect, a way to extract more value from the acquisition budget you are already committing.

The practical implication is clear: audit your checkout against each of the five drivers identified here, starting with payment method coverage and flow complexity. Guest checkout, one-page flows, stored credentials and wallet support are not nice-to-haves. They are the baseline expectation of a checkout that converts in 2024.

Source: bcg.com

Related reading

• SCA friction is costing merchants revenue: own your data
• Why your credit card form is still killing conversions

The post Why checkout experience is the conversion lever retailers underestimate appeared first on betaaloptimaal.nl.